Hello Scott, I don't use it, but seems an interested project. I can work on it, but it would be great if you have a maintainer that already know the project.
Cheers, Emmanuel On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 05:23:53PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > The gtts package is, at least nominally, maintained by the Debian Python > Team, > but has no human uploader. As a practical matter, I think someone should > either adopt it (add themselves to uploaders) or we should formally orphan > the > package so we aren't pretending. > > It has two rdepends: > > Reverse-Depends > =============== > * dialect [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el] > * mnemosyne > > I personally track mnemosyne, even though it's not team maintained, because i > have an interest in the package. I noticed it was going to be removed from > Testing because of a FTBFS bug in gtts, so I fixed gtts by updating it to the > current upstream release. Looking at the upload history, it's been this way > for awhile. > > One consequence of it not being actually maintained is that we released > bookworm with a non-functional gtts package (see #1030290). If anyone had > been paying attention to the package, they would have noticed that should > have > been an RC bug (it is now) and it would have either been fixed or removed. > > The package is now in not awful shape in Unstable (and barring surprises > Testing later today), but it could still use some work. The major immediate > task for a potential maintainer would be working with the Stable Release > Managers to get bookworm fixed. > > If you're interested in the package and wiling to watch over it, please let > me > know via email. If I don't hear back, I'll assume no one is interested and > orphan it in a week or two. > > Thanks, > > Scott K
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
