On 2026-11-05 10:30, Pieter Lenaerts wrote:
> On Wed Nov 4, 2026 at 11:35 PM CET, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> 
> Hi Emmanuel!
> 
> > I took monty from #debian-python team irc topic.
> >
> > I'm leaving some comments:
> >
> > - Regarding popitem_may_be_fifo_or_lifo.patch, patch can be forward to
> >   upstream?
> 
> Yes. Honestly, I tend to be so happy I'm almost finished with a package that I
> forget to forward patches.
> 
> I forwarded it and marked others as not-needed if they were debian specific.
> 
> > - NIT, It would be better if you commit the change per sé and the
> >   changelog entry in the same commit. E.g
> >   60732a335b542b3a36762e3ffd683fef98a58ffb and
> >   16c7fcc10321fdb8357e45a2878c47d51fb7781a can be the same. Do you
> >   know debcommit?
> 
> Cool. I didn't know it. Will try it out.
> 
> > - NIT, New upstream version 2026.10.21, is superfluous mentions the
> >   version IMHO.
> 
> Okay. Will take that into account in the future.

Sorry for don't be clear. The 'new upstream release', is okey (and it
should be in the changelog). Mentioning the <version> IMO, can be ignored.

> 
> > Let me know if we should send the patch to upstream, the rest are nit.
> 
> Thanks for your time!


Uploaded!

Thanks for your contributions to Debian!

> 
> Pieter



-- 
cheers,
        Emmanuel Arias

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  [email protected]
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: 13796755BBC72BB8ABE2AEB5 FA9DEC5DE11C63F1
 ⠈⠳⣄

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to