Your message dated Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:14:20 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2003 16:19:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 14 11:19:50 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net (glaurung.green-gryphon.com) 
[12.107.230.171] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 1956gQ-0002fV-00; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:19:50 -0500
Received: from glaurung.green-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
        by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-1) with ESMTP id 
h3EGGblD002631;
        Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:16:40 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-1) id 
h3EGGZHu002629;
        Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:16:35 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tubesock: No manual pages for swf2txt and tubesock
Reply-To: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:16:35 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tubesock
Version: 0.2+20021011-2
Severity: normal

Hi,

        The binaries /usr/bin/swf2txt and /usr/bin/tubesock have no manual 
pages,
 in violation of Debian policy.  

                manoj

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux glaurung 2.4.20-loop-ptrace #1 SMP Fri Apr 11 16:20:06 CDT 2003 
i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Versions of packages tubesock depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0                   1.2.2-4    The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6                         2.3.1-16   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib2.0-0                  2.2.1-3    The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0                   2.2.1-4    The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0                 1.2.1-3    Layout and rendering of internatio

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 188996-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2003 05:14:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 14 00:14:47 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1A9HWB-0007Yp-00; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:14:47 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id A651726B8E; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:14:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 3312DFE99; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:14:20 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:14:20 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_99
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

tubesock has been removed from Debian unstable.  The reasons are:
orphaned over 250 days, not in stable, orphaned upstream, swf-plater
is better.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to