Your message dated Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:36:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing librudiments reports, fixed in current version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2002 17:01:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 25 12:01:44 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cicero.e-mis.co.uk [212.240.194.162] (mail)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 1857qB-0003wP-00; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:01:43 -0500
Received: from [10.139.61.253] (helo=tacitus)
        by cicero.e-mis.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1857qA-0007vz-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:01:42 +0100
Received: from james by tacitus with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1857qA-0000aD-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:01:42 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: librudiments0_0.24-1(unstable/sparc): missing build-depends
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25 Oct 2002 18:01:41 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 26
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0
        tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: librudiments0
Version: 0.24-1
Severity: serious

You appear to be missing a build-depends on autoconf.  And redirecting
errors to /dev/null is evil ...

| Automatic build of librudiments0_0.24-1 on vore by sbuild/sparc 1.169
| Build started at 20021024-0249
| ******************************************************************************

[...]

| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper

[...]

| autoconf ./configure.in > configure 2> /dev/null
| make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127

A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparc&pkg=librudiments0&ver=0.24-1

-- 
James

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 166364-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2004 05:36:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 25 21:36:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AwECO-0003W1-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:36:41 -0800
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA27743;
        Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:36:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i1Q5aWCb009109;
        Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:36:32 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:36:32 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing librudiments reports, fixed in current version
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level: 

closing librudiments reports, tagged as fixed (and are fixed in
current version). closing the NMU report, as this package is QA
anyway.


Reply via email to