Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Huh, why not? changelog entries which in retrospect fail to correctly > describe the change, or have typo's, or whatever
I'm not sure, but for me the changelog describes the history of the package and usually I don't change old entries ... but I'm not the maintainer here, so I guess he'll decide what he want to do. BTW in both case, that's a old changelog entry and not a big problem ... and if the entry is changed, next time somebody will look on curiosa archives he'll wondering what's happened to this :) Cheers, Sebastien Bacher
