Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 00:02:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2001 04:23:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 30 22:23:25 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlrel7.hp.com [156.153.255.213]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16Ktyv-0008HA-00; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 22:23:25 -0600
Received: from security.hp.com (cranston.fc.hp.com [15.1.44.224])
by atlrel7.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E11E00129
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 23:22:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smallone.fc.hp.com (smallone.fc.hp.com [15.1.44.235])
by security.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847971872F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 21:22:53 -0700 (MST)
Received: by smallone.fc.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 43CF31C4CA; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 21:23:22 -0700 (MST)
From: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nitpic: Build failure with g++ 3.0 (hppa/unstable)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 21:23:22 -0700 (MST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: nitpic
Version: 0.1-8.1
Severity: important
Build fails on hppa, which requires g++ 3.0. Filing important because hppa
is in woody.
Build log available at:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=nitpic&ver=0.1-8.1&arch=hppa&stamp=1006983808&file=log&as=raw
lamont
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux smallone 2.4.9-pa79 #2 Thu Nov 8 18:18:02 MST 2001
parisc64 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 104835-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 07:02:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 10 00:02:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuQeZ-0001yz-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:02:35 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BuQeZ-0005IW-5P; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:02:35 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bugs done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: The joke that kills.
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 00:02:35 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
These bugs were fixed by NMUs 0.1-8.3 and 0.1-8.2, accepted when the
package was taken by QA at 0.1-8.4.
