Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 00:44:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2004 19:36:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 30 12:36:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.32] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BUW6G-0002s3-00; Sun, 30 May 2004 12:36:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1])
        by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 68B7610D; Sun, 30 May 2004 21:35:33 +0200 (MST)
Received: from mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.12.26])
 by localhost (mx5 [134.2.12.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 21442-03; Sun, 30 May 2004 21:35:31 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from dual (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.15.66])
        by mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id C17E613B; Sun, 30 May 2004 21:35:29 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from mrvn by dual with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1BUW5F-000467-Bf; Sun, 30 May 2004 19:35:01 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4572312662835896511=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends libxt-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.59
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 19:34:55 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (McAfee AntiVirus) at 
informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===============4572312662835896511==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: bbconf
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source

Hi,

your package is missing a Build-Depends libxt-dev.

MfG
        Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-amd64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

--===============4572312662835896511==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bbconf_1.10-1.0.0.1.pure64.patch"

diff -Nurd bbconf-1.10.deb/debian/changelog bbconf-1.10/debian/changelog
--- bbconf-1.10.deb/debian/changelog    2004-05-30 19:28:02.895353859 +0000
+++ bbconf-1.10/debian/changelog        2004-05-30 19:28:10.431262304 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+bbconf (1.10-1.0.0.1.pure64) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Missing Build-Depends libxt-dev
+
+ -- Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sun, 30 May 2004 21:15:05 +0200
+
 bbconf (1.10-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * new upstream release
diff -Nurd bbconf-1.10.deb/debian/control bbconf-1.10/debian/control
--- bbconf-1.10.deb/debian/control      2004-05-30 19:28:02.896353691 +0000
+++ bbconf-1.10/debian/control  2004-05-30 19:28:10.432262135 +0000
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: x11
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: libqt3-mt-dev, debhelper (>> 3.0.0)
+Build-Depends: libqt3-mt-dev, debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libxt-dev | xlibs-dev (<< 
4.3.0)
 Standards-Version: 3.5.2
 
 Package: bbconf

--===============4572312662835896511==--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 251768-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 07:44:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 10 00:44:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BuRIt-0007kt-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:44:15 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1BuRIt-0005SW-Ht; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:44:15 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bugs done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
                 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Zippy-Says: I guess we can live on his POT FARM in HADES!!
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 00:44:15 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


These bugs were fixed in NMUs 1.10-1.1 and 1.10-1.2, and accepted when
QA took the package at 1.10-2.

Reply via email to