Hello On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:56:56AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > reopen 255955 > thanks > > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Description: > > mmake - Makefile generator for Java programs > > Closes: 199875 216534 255955 > > Changes: > > mmake (2.2.1-4) unstable; urgency=low > > . > > * Updated copyright file so it include GPL in a correct way, closes: > > #255955. > > This is seriously wrong. Did you read the history of bug 255955 > before closing this? > > Where did you get a proper reference to the GPL from? Upstream has > not actually licensed the program under the GPL. I have asked > upstream to clarify, and if we don't get a reply, the package must be > removed from Debian. Certainly the RC bug must be left open. This > package cannot go into release without a proper license.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/build/debian/_qa/mmake-2.2.1$ ls -l GNUGPL.TXT LICENSE -rw-r--r-- 1 ola ola 14822 2001-02-12 23:42 GNUGPL.TXT -rw-r--r-- 1 ola ola 280 2001-02-12 23:42 LICENSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/build/debian/_qa/mmake-2.2.1$ My reference comes from that GNUGPL.TXT in the source. The LICENSE file is a bit short but the GNUGPL.TXT file covers everything just as it should. It just has an uncommon name, that is all. I can not see anything wrong with this. If you read the debian copyright file, you can see that I refer to that file instead of the file LICENSE. Or do you still think I did something wrong here? Regards, // Ola > Thomas -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------
