Jerome Alet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:45:49PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: >> Well, my gut feeling is that jaxml is dead upstream and not likely to >> be adopted (I've never had much luck contacting Victor, cf. #305460, >> #312834, #317408). I'll be glad to be proven wrong of course. > > Your feeling was incorrect. > > The fact that there's no new upstream release doesn't mean that the > project is dead. Being the original author, I can confirm it is not.
I'm glad to hear that. However, we do need a Debian maintainer for jaxml -- it hasn't had one for a year and a half -- so I'd still like to hear from Victor. > I'm just back from holidays and seeing a lot of debian messages > about this software. I'm currently trying to read the 1500 messages > which waited for me to be back, when this is done, if something has > to be changed to jaxml I'll do it. The necessary changes were Debian-specific, and have been taken care of by Pierre [1] and me [2]. [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jaxml/news/20060802T115443Z.html [2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jaxml/news/20060806T213217Z.html Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]