On Sam, 16 Dez 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > 3) Retain aleph, and change the name of the binary in one package or the
> > other. If we don't do (2), and the release team is not happy with (1),
> > then this is obviously the right course. I don't care at all which
> > program's name is changed or what it's changed to. What are the pros
> > and cons?
>
> Sounds like this is the way to go.
THis name change is currently under discussion in the tex-live
(upstream) mailing list with the original authors participating. As soon
as we have come to a conclusion there it will be executed in Debian.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Università di Siena
Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SWANIBOST (adj.)
Complete shagged out after a hard day having income tax explained to
you.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
