Your message dated Wed, 1 Dec 2010 22:25:33 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#502605: Still existing in 1.2?
has caused the Debian Bug report #502605,
regarding numlockx: Error compiling keymap
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
502605: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502605
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: numlockx
Version: 1.1-9
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
When having xnumlock installed do I get these error messages in Xorg.log:
(EE) Error compiling keymap (server-0)
(EE) XKB: Couldn't compile keymap
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (995, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (600, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages numlockx depends on:
ii libc6 2.7-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 X11 client-side library
ii libxtst6 2:1.0.3-1 X11 Testing -- Resource extension
numlockx recommends no packages.
Versions of packages numlockx suggests:
pn x-display-manager <none> (no description available)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkj5rD8ACgkQw5UvgfnzqGpeGgCeLOtSzRFszuMsY/7R8VRF4+j7
gG8AnRqtK6huVSgx/foqEwLMajLuj4kC
=48Dy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2-1
Dne Wed, 1 Dec 2010 19:57:56 +0100
Anders Lagerås <[email protected]> napsal(a):
> Hello
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:56:34 +0100
> Michal Čihař <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I've tried to reproduce this issue with 1.2 and it does not seem to
> > happen anymore. Are you able to reproduce it?
> No, it seems to work now.
Thanks for confirming, closing.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
