Your message dated Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:35:29 +0200
with message-id <20130626163529.GA25255@debian.WAG160N>
and subject line Re: fortune-mod: Still need new fortunes webform hosting?
has caused the Debian Bug report #636195,
regarding fortune-mod: Still need new fortunes webform hosting?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
636195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636195
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fortune-mod
Version: 1:1.99.1-4
Severity: wishlist
Hi! The maintainer notes in the fortunes-min docs in /usr/share suggests
that there's need for a server to host a webform for new fortune
submissions. If this is still the case, I volunteer mine.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500,
'oldstable-proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages fortune-mod depends on:
ii libc6 2.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii librecode0 3.6-17 Shared library on which recode is
Versions of packages fortune-mod recommends:
ii fortunes-min [fortune-cookie- 1:1.99.1-4 Data files containing fortune cook
Versions of packages fortune-mod suggests:
ii bsdmainutils 8.0.13 collection of more utilities from
pn fortunes <none> (no description available)
ii x11-utils 7.5+4 X11 utilities
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Fortune-mod seems abandoned upstream. The Debian package is orphaned, I'm
adopting it since I am an eager user of it.
Given that, I don't think your kind offer is still needed. hence I'm closing
this bug.
--
Andrea Colangelo | http://andreacolangelo.com
Ubuntu Developer <www.ubuntu.com> | Debian Maintainer <www.debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
