lamby wrote: > I believe there is a typo in debian/rules: > > override_dh_autoconfigure -> override_dh_auto_configure > > Patch attached.
I'm afraid your patch is 0 bytes long. If what you intended is the obvious one character change, then plugwash tried it in #897114: } The only tricky bit was that there seems to have been a typo in } debian/rules, there was a target called override_dh_autoconfigure which I } presume was a typo for override_dh_autoconfigure , I tried fixing said } typo but that seemed to cause more problems than it solved, so I left it } alone and added my own override target. You might want to consider either } fixing or removing the dead code. Thus, it would need more attention at than my drive-by QA upload to fix the FTBFS has tuits allotted for. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Certified airhead; got the CT scan to prove that! ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
