Your message dated Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:45:15 -0500
with message-id <4c93b955511bdb596b08f48b0eb3d51d8ee019d0.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#915602: Please upgrade to a newer snapshot/version
has caused the Debian Bug report #915602,
regarding Please upgrade to a newer snapshot/version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
915602: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915602
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnulib
Version: 20140202+stable-3
Severity: normal

Hi,

Current version is quite old (2014) and some other packages seems to
require a newer version (see enchant bug #861141)

Would it be possible to upgrade to a newer version?

Kind regards,

Laurent Bigonville

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: SELinux: enabled - Mode: Permissive - Policy name: refpolicy

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 20200105~a7903da-1

This should be fixed with the upload of new gnulib snpashot.

-- 
Cheers,
Boyuan Yang

On Thu, 09 Jan 2020 12:09:47 -0500 Boyuan Yang <by...@debian.org> wrote:
> X-Debbugs-CC: jo...@jones.dk  bi...@debian.org mckins...@debian.org
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> A new snapshot of gnulib is currently in Experimental. I have rebuilt all
> reverse dependencies and so far only libtool would FTBFS. Actually sollya is
> also failing to build but that was due to a separate issue (
> https://bugs.debian.org/947720).
> 
> I only enabled a very small portion of testsuites in the new upload. The
full
> test ("megatest" for all) would take really long time (several hours on my
> workstation) and eventually fail. We need more work to get the package into
> better shape.
> 
> Thanks,
> Boyuan Yang
> 
> 
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:01:41 -0400 Boyuan Yang <by...@debian.org> wrote:
> > X-Debbugs-CC: jo...@jones.dk  bi...@debian.org
> > 
> > I have played around and prepared a new packaging release in the
> experimental
> > branch based on the codebase on Oct 2019: 
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnulib/tree/experimental
> > 
> > The issue is that newer gnulib requires newer gettext (>= 0.20) to work,
> which
> > is not yet available in Debian. Though it's possible to patch the source
> code
> > and loosen the version requirement, I haven't really test what will
happen.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Boyuan Yang
> > 
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2018 17:41:30 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk>
wrote:
> > > Control: tag -1 help
> > > 
> > > Hi Laurent,
> > > 
> > > Quoting Laurent Bigonville (2018-12-05 09:29:03)
> > > > Current version is quite old (2014) and some other packages seems to 
> > > > require a newer version (see enchant bug #861141)
> > > > 
> > > > Would it be possible to upgrade to a newer version?
> > > 
> > > Yes, gnulib is too old for recent enchant - in fact that is the very 
> > > reason I wanted to pour some love on gnulib.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately gnulib packaging is in a bad shape: It comes with a 
> > > testsuite but that is skipped - I am quite worried that a major upgrade 
> > > may introduce new bugs, and therefore want to first get the testsuite 
> > > enabled, learn which parts of the testsuite succeeds for the old 2014 
> > > release, and only then upgrade to have a reasonable judgement if the 
> > > upgrade is sane to introduce to Debian unstable.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to