Package: libarpack++2-dev Version: 2.3-10build2 Severity: important Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Dear Maintainer, Fix for at least the observed instance of this problem is captured here: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/arpackcpp/-/merge_requests/3 There may be other similar instances of this problem in the package that are yet to be identified. * What led up to the situation? - Unable to build against libarpack++2-dev with default options due to changes in recent version of gcc. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? - Explicit "this->" statements were added where needed to remedy the problem. * What was the outcome of this action? - Was able to build with default gcc options after the update. * What outcome did you expect instead? - Expected outcome was observed. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers noble-updates APT policy: (500, 'noble-updates'), (500, 'noble-security'), (500, 'noble'), (100, 'noble-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.8.0-94-generic (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages libarpack++2-dev depends on: ii libarpack++2c2a 2.3-10build2 ii libarpack2-dev 3.9.1-1.1build2 Versions of packages libarpack++2-dev recommends: ii libopenblas-dev 0.3.26+ds-1ubuntu0.1 ii libsuperlu-dev 6.0.1+dfsg1-1build1 libarpack++2-dev suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
