Your message dated 11 Aug 1998 17:00:21 -0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in Version 2.4.1.3
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 1998 11:30:46 +0000
Received: (qmail 21829 invoked from network); 2 May 1998 11:30:45 -0000
Received: from nymphe.m.isar.de (193.141.69.3)
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 2 May 1998 11:30:45 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by nymphe.m.ISAR.de (8.8.7/8.8.7/nymphe-2.1) with UUCP id NAA08439
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 2 May 1998 13:30:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nymphe.m.ISAR.de: Umonet set sender to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by monet.painters.schwarz-online.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA17257
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 2 May 1998 12:50:55 +0200
Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 12:50:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Minor corrections - Policy Manual 2.4.1.0
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Package: debian-policy
I received this via private mail:
On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This message is not intended to address policy (if it was, I
> would copy it to the mailing list). It deals only with matters of
> spelling, grammar and usage.
>
> "Required", under Section 2.2 Priorities says:
>
> You must not remove these packages or your system may become
> totally broken and you may probably not even be able to use dpkg to
> put things back. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> This is redundant wording. It should read either "may not even
> be able" or (slightly stronger) "probably will not be able".
>
> "Important", in the same section, says:
>
> "If the expectation is that an experienced Unix person who found it
> missing would go `What the F*!@<+ is going on, where is foo',"
> ^^
> "say" is much preferable to "go" in this context. That usage of
> "go" is "Valley-speak" or teenage slang, no standard English.
>
> In 3.3.5 Symbolic links it says: "link targets like `foo/../bar'
> are depreciated". "deprecated" is the proper word in this usage.
>
> I hope this doesn't come across as too critical of your English
> skills. Ever since I started reading the Debian mailing lists, I have
> been very favorably impressed by the English skills of the majority of
> the European maintainers, and you are among the best in that respect.
>
> Bob
> --
> _
> |_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USA PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
>
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian GNU/Linux? [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
http://www.debian.org http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
