Your message dated 26 Nov 1998 20:24:44 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xbomb should have 'arch: any' instead of 'arch: i386'
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 1997 01:03:14 +0000
Received: (qmail 6219 invoked from network); 23 Jun 1997 01:03:12 -0000
Received: from mail-out1.apple.com (17.254.0.52)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 23 Jun 1997 01:03:12 -0000
Received: from scv3.apple.com (A17-128-100-121.apple.com [17.128.100.121])
by mail-out1.apple.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA38458;
Sun, 22 Jun 1997 18:00:42 -0700
Received: from brasdor.apple.com (brasdor.apple.com [17.202.41.239])
by scv3.apple.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA30080;
Sun, 22 Jun 1997 18:05:46 -0700
Received: from klee by brasdor.apple.com with local (Exim 1.62 #6)
id 0wfqys-0002Ic-00 (Debian); Sun, 22 Jun 1997 18:03:18 +0000
From: Klee Dienes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Klee Dienes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xbomb should have 'arch: any' instead of 'arch: i386'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 18:03:18 +0000
Package: xbomb
Version: 2.0
debian/control should have 'Architecture: any' instead of
'Architecture: i386', so that this package can be built on non-Intel
architectures.
