Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Package: set6x86 >Version: 1.5-4 >Severity: serious >X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org > >set6x86 (which is orphaned, but has a wrong maintainer field), does not >build from source: > >cc -O2 -g -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.5\" -o 6x86_reg 6x86_reg.c >6x86_reg.c: In function `get_IO_range': >6x86_reg.c:53: warning: implicit declaration of function `ioperm' >6x86_reg.c: In function `main': >6x86_reg.c:281: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous `else' >6x86_reg.c:321: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous `else' >6x86_reg.c:86: Invalid `asm' statement: >6x86_reg.c:86: fixed or forbidden register 0 (ax) was spilled for class AREG. >make[1]: *** [6x86_reg] Error 1 >make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/bas/orphan/set6x86-1.5' >make: *** [build] Error 2 > >the problem with ioperm is easily solved by including <sys/io.h> instead >of <unistd.h> (which was used in libc5). I don't know how to solve the >assembler problem, though.
I've solved it, but I'm very reluctant to upload a package like set6x86 which I have no way of testing, especially when I'm poking at assembler. Does anyone have a Cyrix 6x86 on which they could test my package? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
