Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:36:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line dpkg-mountable removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 1999 13:12:37 +0000
Received: (qmail 1445 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1999 13:12:37 -0000
Received: from sunu450.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (134.147.222.33)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 1999 13:12:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 10661 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1999 13:12:34 -0000
Received: from dialppp-5-223.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (HELO localhost) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
  by mailhost.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with SMTP; 5 Sep 1999 13:12:34 -0000
Received: from marcus by localhost with local (Exim 2.11 #1 (Debian))
        id 11NONX-0000fX-00; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 00:33:47 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dpkg-mountable: patch for Hurd
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 00:33:47 +0200
Organization: Marcus Brinkmann's Home

Package: dpkg-mountable
Version: 0.8
Severity: normal

Hello,

with the below patch logcmd can be compiled on the Hurd, too.

Thanks,
Marcus

--- logcmd.c~   Tue Sep 30 19:47:00 1997
+++ logcmd.c    Sun Sep  5 00:28:04 1999
@@ -80,10 +80,10 @@
 #include <termios.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
 
-#ifdef __linux__
+#ifdef __unix__
 #define SECSPERMIN             60
 #define __dead
-#endif /* __linux__ */
+#endif /* __unix__ */
 
 FILE   *fscript;
 int    master, slave;


-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux ulysses 2.2.10-ac9 #1 Mit Jul 14 01:43:01 CEST 1999 i586 
unknown

Versions of the packages dpkg-mountable depends on:
ii  libc6           2.1.2-0pre11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 44381-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2001 13:36:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 22 08:36:40 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web1.lanscape.net [64.240.156.194] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14rK2Y-0002v2-00; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:36:38 -0500
Received: from fisch.cyrius.com (web1.lanscape.net [64.240.156.194])
        by web1.lanscape.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA21428;
        Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:36:23 -0500
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 38987229CF; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:36:49 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:36:49 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dpkg-mountable removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

dpkg-mountable has been removed from Debian unstable and won't be
released with the next official release of Debian, codenamed "woody".

The original maintainer writes:

| * I can no longer test new versions of this package, as I'm using
|   apt-zip rather than my not-free dialup access.  I wrote it when I
|   was accessing the University's NFS archive mirror!
|
| * It's slightly buggy, and badly out-of-date policy-wise.
|
| * Apt now provides (AFAIK) all the features provided by
|   dpkg-mountable, and some (such as package ordering) that it never
|   got around to getting.

Please switch to apt.

If you have questions about this, please contact me.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to