Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:36:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line dpkg-mountable removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2001 21:46:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 01 15:46:19 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [::ffff:198.144.200.155]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14Yatv-0006kg-00; Thu, 01 Mar 2001 15:46:19 -0600
Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
id B4431BC02C; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:46:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: seems to leave cruft behind when purged
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 13:46:17 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg-muntable
Version: N/A; reported 2001-03-01
Severity: normal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log>dpkg --purge dpkg-mountable
(Reading database ... 97577 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing dpkg-mountable ...
dpkg - warning: while removing dpkg-mountable, directory
`/var/lib/dpkg/methods/mountable' not empty so not removed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log>ls -l /var/lib/dpkg/methods/mountable
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1.0k Mar 5 1999 ./
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 1.0k Feb 13 2000 ../
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 163 Mar 5 1999 options
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log>ls -l dpkg-mountable.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Feb 25 00:23 dpkg-mountable.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 37 Feb 18 00:24 dpkg-mountable.1.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 37 Feb 11 00:24 dpkg-mountable.2.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 37 Feb 4 00:23 dpkg-mountable.3.gz
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux kite 2.4.0 #1 Sat Jan 6 13:16:16 PST 2001 i686
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 88174-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2001 13:36:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 22 08:36:40 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web1.lanscape.net [64.240.156.194]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14rK2Y-0002v2-00; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:36:38 -0500
Received: from fisch.cyrius.com (web1.lanscape.net [64.240.156.194])
by web1.lanscape.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA21428;
Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:36:23 -0500
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 38987229CF; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:36:49 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:36:49 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dpkg-mountable removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dpkg-mountable has been removed from Debian unstable and won't be
released with the next official release of Debian, codenamed "woody".
The original maintainer writes:
| * I can no longer test new versions of this package, as I'm using
| apt-zip rather than my not-free dialup access. I wrote it when I
| was accessing the University's NFS archive mirror!
|
| * It's slightly buggy, and badly out-of-date policy-wise.
|
| * Apt now provides (AFAIK) all the features provided by
| dpkg-mountable, and some (such as package ordering) that it never
| got around to getting.
Please switch to apt.
If you have questions about this, please contact me.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
