On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:50:08AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > I believe it to have been fixed in an easrlier version of xinetd, such that > > the current unstable/testing version 1:2.3.0-1 should not have the issue > > you described (I couldn't reproduce it). > it should have been fixed in the new upstream. i can test that, but i > plan to go back to netkit inetd per Solar Designer's comments on bugtraq...
I am uploading 2.3.3 so that should be okay. I think 2.3.3 has all of Solar Designer's patches finally applied. I would go back to inetd, but I need the ip:port separation :( - So I adoped *grin* > > Could you please check this out and close the bug if it is indeed done? > i will, whenever penguinppc comes back. > > I did email [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it had delivery failures :( > yes, its moving to a new hosting provider at the moment (im not sure > how long that is going to take), [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to this > address normally anyway. Aah - okay - thanks -- Daniel Silverstone http://www.digital-scurf.org/ Hostmaster, Webmaster, and Chief Code Wibbler Digital-Scurf Unlimited GPG Public key available from germany.keyserver.net KeyId: 20687895 How untasteful can you get?
