Your message dated Sat, 10 May 2003 00:05:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#192739: qa.debian.org: http://packages.qa.debian.org/*/*
not clear
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2003 21:28:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 09 16:28:27 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nk210-200-180-161.cl.fx.apol.com.tw (.sina.com.tw)
[210.200.180.161]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19EFPm-0005bl-00; Fri, 09 May 2003 16:28:26 -0500
Received: from jidanni.org (TC218-187-78-45.2-4.pl.apol.com.tw [218.187.78.45])
by .sina.com.tw (8.12.2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h49LclW9092540
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 10 May 2003 05:39:06 +0800 (CST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19ECzA-0000Za-00; Sat, 10 May 2003 02:52:48 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org: http://packages.qa.debian.org/*/* not clear
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 02:52:48 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-10
Severity: wishlist
Lets say the user has just jumped to, oh,
http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wwwoffle.html
Todo
You should update the package to follow the last version of
[26]Debian Policy (Standards-Version 3.5.9 instead of 3.5.1).
The "you" isn't clear: the user? the developer?...
Warning: the "Latest News" section is not yet automatically updated.
I'm waiting that master.debian.org is upgraded to woody (stable) in
The "I" isn't clear: the developer? the qa site maintainer?...
order to be able to setup the required scripts. Those scripts will
automatically update the "Latest News" and they'll let you add your
own news items. Please be patient.
The "you" isn't clear, but probably the developer.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 192739-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2003 22:06:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 09 17:05:59 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a1-2.ppp10.hrnet.fr (buxy.ouaza.com) [212.94.201.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19EG06-0000LN-00; Fri, 09 May 2003 17:05:58 -0500
Received: by buxy.ouaza.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3AC1BEB43D; Sat, 10 May 2003 00:05:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 00:05:24 +0200
From: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#192739: qa.debian.org: http://packages.qa.debian.org/*/* not
clear
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-23.8 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Le Sat, May 10, 2003 at 02:52:48AM +0800, Dan Jacobson écrivait:
> The "you" isn't clear: the user? the developer?...
[...]
> The "I" isn't clear: the developer? the qa site maintainer?...
[...]
> The "you" isn't clear, but probably the developer.
I removed all references to "I" and "you". It will be updated during the
night ...
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
