On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 06:37:20PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Funnily I'm the one who added that "rule" for the NMU in the > developers-reference ... because I think it's useful for NMU : > - the developer NMUed has no time otherwise he wouldn't be NMUed > - the maintainer will get angry if has more problems after the NMU > > So it's better to be careful and follow what's happening after an NMU. > However for QA, it's not so important since the QA maintainers are > supposed to be never MIA since we're a group. So if a problem happen after > an upload, there will be someone else to notice it and to fix it or at > least to inform the uploader of his mistake.
Fairy 'nuff. > > You can use 'at' to auto-unsubscribe > > after a while. > > I know the trick, I explained it recently: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2003/debian-qa-200307/msg00078.html > > :-) I have a terrible problem of not reading who is writing stuff on-lists, and just absorbing the content. I knew I should have checked who made that suggestion... <g> > > Mmmmkay. The devel-ref will never look the same again... > > Your patch has not yet been accepted. :-) The big one hasn't even been written yet. I honestly don't expect any of the dev-ref authors (yourself included) to necessarily have the time to integrate my patch in, what, 48 hours? I'm happy to give it a bit of time. - Matt
