Your message dated Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:53:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#206899: qa.debian.org: RC bug counts don't ignore bugs
tagged sarge-ignore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2003 16:48:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 23 11:48:03 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (yurika.videohost.com.au) [203.30.194.49]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19qbYZ-0003QF-00; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 11:48:03 -0500
Received: by yurika.videohost.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1014)
id 088B3230038; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 02:47:59 +1000 (EST)
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org: RC bug counts don't ignore bugs tagged sarge-ignore
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 02:47:59 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-24
Severity: wishlist
That's pretty much it. For an example,
http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/base.cgi
Serious bugs in dhcp, 3 of the 4 are tagged sarge-ignore.
This should prolly affect the parenthesised count, rather
than the main count.
(I submitted a similar bug the other day, but the return
email address was screwed and the bug seems to have disappeared)
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux yurika.videohost.com.au 2.4.18 #1 Wed Dec 4 14:13:05 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 206899-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2003 19:53:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 23 14:53:37 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.111]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19qeS6-0003HI-00; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 14:53:34 -0500
Received: from host81-129-36-235.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.129.36.235]
helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by gadolinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
id 19qeS5-0002MD-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:53:33 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 19qeS3-0000VH-00; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:53:31 +0100
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:53:31 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#206899: qa.debian.org: RC bug counts don't ignore bugs tagged
sarge-ignore
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:47:59AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-24
> Severity: wishlist
>
> That's pretty much it. For an example,
> http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/base.cgi
Oops, quite right. Fixed, thanks.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
