Andreas Barth wrote: >I want to support this. For example, the discussion about the total >removal of rocks-n-diamonds is not even one week old. So, I'd like to >wait just a bit.
Following a very long background, including long-standing consensus that the current version of the package should not be released in any version of Debian. We've got to do something sometime. If a new, DFSG-free rocks-n-diamongs package gets uploaded, it can always go through the NEW queue. >Same is for mirrormagic. The RC-bug was filled yesterday, and the >maintainer did answer to it. IMHO there is no need for the qa-team to >put any more effort in it (though I assume that the maintainer would >happily accept help for sorting out the files). Here I agree with you.