Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Hmm, after only looking short to the output I think there is one big > factor missing from the calculation: time. Take for example my package > eject. It was uploaded yesterday and not all autobuilders have built it > yet... so what? There is nothing wrong with it, its just the way things > go.
I agree. I've modified it to only list packages with actual problems. > Also I don't understand why you take the popcon output that important. It's an attempt to weigh in the user impact of a problem with a specific package. A package used by thousands could be considered more urgent to fix than a package used by a handful. It's crude, but the best suggestion I've heard so far. The list was never really intended to be a "healt status" page, though. It's just a bit of fun statistics I made since I already have the data parsed and available. If it can be made useful, that's a bonus. As always, I'm open for suggestions. -- Björn
