Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > I don't object to doing a cleanup now, but my QA bug here is not about > > doing one now, but about creating an infrastructure and record-keeping > > system that would provide advice and information. > > This system could only trigger manual checks, it's close to impossible > to check automatically, whether a project is either dead upstream or > undistributable. Checking whether the RPFed package name is already in > the archive seems feasible, although it wouldn't have caught the two > candidates I found, which were packaged under different names than > requested in the RFPs.
Right. I just mean a thing that would provide information and advice to people who would then do manual checks. Oh, and there's another thing that just occurred to me. We have a check to make sure that orphaned packages have their maintainer set to QA, but do we have the converse?
