Last Wednesday 20 July 2005 21:53, Raphaël Hertzog was like: > Hello, > > following the previous thread concerning listing of ubuntu patches in > the PTS, I have a similar idea but concerning the debtags project. > > Erich, could you provide (regularly, at least daily) a file listing > packages which are not yet fully categorized within debtags ? > > If possible i'd like it to be even more fine-grained... you could > provide a list of missing facets for each package. For each facet, > you must tell us the URL at which we should redirect people so that they > select the appropriate tags concerning that facet. > (I think that the redirected webpage should only display tags associated > to a single facet, otherwise it gets too complicated to handle) > > The problem is a bit complicated because not all facets may make sense > for a given package... but you could maybe find out a subset of facet > that a package must implement ? > (or you can add a tag "this facet doesn't apply to the package" to each > facet so that the maintainer can express the fact that this facet has > been dealt with and that it's not applicable)
I've been looking at the debtags editor recently with the idea of clarifying the tags for various multimedia applications. I assume this is the appropriate tool to use? I'm slightly confused as to why the tags specific to A/DeMuDi appear in the 'section' section rather than 'sound'. We can encourage the users to contribute to this as well as providing useful bug-reports, via the a-users mailing list. We need to ensure that non-DeMuDi specific issues in the DeMuDi issue tracker have appropriate reports in Debian's BTS. Is there a way of doing this that would avoid filing mass bug reports? The debtags system is a little obtuse for ordinary users, is that a desirable filter? i.e. only those who can be bothered to try and understand it need apply. A little guidance could go a long way here. cheers, tim hall http://glastonburymusic.org.uk
