On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 11:40:20PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:38:03PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > > Scripsit Justin Pryzby > > > > > Have you considered mailing to pts news address? I don't mean static > > > news, but I think the same place as the uploads go. > > > > It sounds like a good idea to me. > Hmmm there is also the "Testing Status" section [0], which is probably > a better fit. I think the PTS would need to be modified to put stuff > there not generated by "excuses.txt" or whatever.
Status != history, though... What part would be the 'status' here? For history, the 'news' section seems like best suited, so the question remains[1], would it be a waste of space or rather a good use of space to have testings status changes end up in that section too? > Maybe the PTS scripts themselves should be sending the mails, for > maximal integration? DAK should send them, I'd say, and I think I saw somewhere already some discussion about that. Of course, I can stash the script under qa somewhere, if Henning for some reason no longer wants to run it under his user, but I think it's best to have it simply directly moved to the most-correct place. In any case it shouldn't be the PTS subsystem itself that sends out these mails, that's besides the purpose and design of it. --Jeroen [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2005/11/msg00070.html, first paragraph (I've been ... are welcome) -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
