On 18/10/06 at 08:49 -0500, Kevin Glynn wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> > Hi,
> >
>
> >
> > I only built packages according to their Architecture: field. I didn't
> > consider the Packages-arch-specific list.
> >
>
> I see you have failed build logs for mozart, but from the control file:
>
> Package: mozart
> Architecture: hppa i386 m68k mipsel mips powerpc sparc s390 arm
>
> So, why was it tried?
Because, from the Sources file:
Package: mozart
Binary: mozart, mozart-doc
Version: 1.3.2.20060615-2
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Maintainer: Kevin Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), bison (>= 1.25), flex-old (>=
2.5.3), gs, l
ibgdbm-dev, libgmp3-dev, m4, netpbm, sp, tcl8.4-dev, tetex-bin,
tetex-extra, tk8
.4-dev, zlib1g-dev, emacs21 | xemacs21
Architecture: any
^^^^^
Anyway, this will go away when I'll support Packages-arch-specific[0].
It says:
%mozart: !alpha !ia64 !amd64 # %'who would ever need > 32-bits??'
[0]
http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?cvsroot=dak&rev=HEAD
That's great, because it means I have yet another huge list of
easy-to-get-rid-of false positive :)
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
