Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 04:16:22PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> * There are two reports for each maintainer. The one under maintainer, > What did you decide for the lists related to the two kind of reports we > discussed in #458329 ? If you have stable URLs for them (of course > modulo the fact that the current base URL is there only for testing > purposes) and, more important, stable format for them we can start > adding support for them on the PTS side. I haven't done anything with this yet; qa-list.txt is still just errors and warnings. I'm leaning towards adding info, experimental, and override counts to the same file, since the only thing I knew for sure was using it isn't running. However, it looks like qa-list.txt has been unchanged since before 2004, so I'm still a bit nervous that I might break something. >> * Multiple maintainers with the same e-mail address will have all their > Not related, but out of curiosity: will support for Uploaders be part of > this round of lintian.d.o updates or not? > /me blatantly trying to mob Russ in order to see it implemented ASAP :-) Supporting Uploaders isn't too difficult, but it requires changing the file format of lintian's package lists, which makes it tricky to test on lintian.d.o. I may get to it anyway, though. If it doesn't make this release, it will be in the next one. I don't think we've resolved the issue around parsing the Uploaders list given the presence of Adam C. Powell, IV. I plan on splitting on comma, which is going to break for him. Ah, but I see that the one package for which he's an Uploader, he dropped the comma. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
