Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Jack T Mudge III wrote: > >> AFAICT, it would seem that didiwiki is in this group as well. I found >> plenty of links to it's nonexistant homepage. It's a frusterating >> situation, since most users (myself included) expect to be able to go to >> the homepage and find out more about the package. > > Well, we have more links than homepage references and thus we might run > a link checker periodically onto the descriptions. The question is, what > finally is the best thing to do if there is a broken link.
On that subject please refer to #459012 > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
