Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:45:42PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: >> I've compiled a list of orphaned packages that were not part of etch >> (and, unless otherwise noted, were not part of sarge). >> >> I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from >> testing) before lenny's release. Including a package in a stable release >> gives it much more weight and it usually survives longer in the archive >> even if it only bitrots. So removing unneccessary packages now would be >> a good idea IMHO. > > I've now filed bugs against those packages: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=npolsr-cleanup;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let me see if I got it right: You filed a bug against karchiver because it: * is not in etch (because it was not uploaded in time for etch), * is orphaned (...); and because * it has a "low" popcon (283/86 inst/vote; for a package that has never been in stable) And because of those reasons we are preventing a package from being shipped in lenny? Is that right? IMHO there are many other packages that are better candidates for not being shipped in lenny than the above mentioned example. > > Gruesse, Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
