On 15/08/08 at 05:49 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:01:26AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >>>>> - O: bugs are now RC, so packages are removed from testing using the >>>>> release team's existing policies. Which means that some O: packages >>>>> might stay in testing for a longer time because they are dependencies >>>>> of other packages. >> >>>> Were members of the release team represented in this BoF? >> >>> Sure, Luk was here, and didn't express any disagreement. Actually, I >>> tried hard to give several opportunities to raise concerns, but >>> everybody apparently really agreed with the proposal. >> >> Hrm, ok... well, I still disagree, but I seem to be overruled :) > > The orphanage bug being RC does only mean that it needs to be adopted, > removed (from unstable and/or testing) or downgraded before the next > release IMHO. The three options should still be possible, but at least > they are actively being watched as having non-maintained packages in the > release should be avoided if possible IMHO.
Could you give an example case where you would want to downgrade an orphaned package's bug? L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
