Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> (05/08/2009):
> Actually, the counter-argument is that we don't want to make it
> *harder* to do a QA upload. Currently, it's "apt-get source ; make
> change ; dput". If we used a VCS, we would have to create: - a process
> to auto-import orphaned packages into the VCS - procedures to commit
> changes to VCS before doing QA uploads
> 
> I don't have numbers about that, but a fair share of QA uploads are done
> by one- or two-timers, even a majority of uploads is done by QA folks.
> We don't want to make it harder for those one-timers to improve the
> status of orphaned packages.

Just to clarify, I meant moving collab-maint/foo.git to e.g.
collab-maint/orphaned/foo.git to make it obvious to folks browsing the
repository that it's orphaned, while retaining the history. Not
suggesting to put everything under $VCS. Sorry for the bad phrasing.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to