Le Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:12:47AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > udd/screenshot_gatherer.py > > This is the typical scheme for all UDD importers but this is a quite > simple one which might properly serve as an example for > upstream-metadata. In the file sql/screenshots.sql you can see the > table definition for the screenshots - this is actually the point I > tried to discuss here: What will be a proper table layout for the > upstream metadata.
Hi Andreas, Since most of the information apart from the bibliographic references is currently sparse, I propose to only import the bibliographic material for the moment. If it fits wells the blends script that creates the web sentinels, perhaps the ‘long’ format (package name / keyword / value) will help us to keep the system most simple. Also, that is the closest to an RDF tuple… After the UDD becomes the source for the bibliographic information in the blends web sentinels, I can start a discussion on debian-devel to see if others are interested to extend the system. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
