On 23/05/10 at 12:32 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote: > On Sun, 23 May 2010 08:40:44 +0200 > Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote: > > > > This one is not even fixing a serious bug: > > > > So? NMUs are not only for serious bugs. > > Then, as Ana said, the developers reference should be changed because > that's just the opposite of the first point in 5.11.1 "When and how to do > an NMU": «Does your NMU really fix bugs? Fixing cosmetic issues or > changing the packaging style in NMUs is discouraged.»
I think that this should be read as "NMUIng when your only changes are cosmetic issues is discouraged". If you are doing an NMU anyway (to fix a real bug), I don't think that it should be discouraged to fix other small issues at the same time, if those changes are reasonable. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100523172207.ga17...@xanadu.blop.info
