Le Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 04:10:52PM +0100, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > * Charles Plessy <[email protected]>, 2012-01-15, 09:59: > >I think that the benefits would be greater if the archive rebuilds > >were also filtering logs, since they use a sbuild version that has > >that capacity. > > FWIW, I don't think this is true. I believe buildds use a > (modified?) sbuild 0.61.0, whereas the log mangling misfeature was > added in 0.62.0.
There must be a misunderstanding; I wrote about the archive rebuilds, not the buildds. See for instance: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/01/12/mafft_6.864-1_lsid64.buildlog sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.62.2 (05 Apr 2011) on stremi-43.reims.grid5000.fr ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ mafft 6.864-1 (amd64) 13 Jan 2012 01:16 ║ ╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝ Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
