Le Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 01:45:26PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > I checked the blends prospective packages gatherer log for > inconsistencies and found: > > $ grep "has upstream file but no references" blends_prospective_gatherer.log > | sed 's/^.*: //' > spread-phy of debian-med has upstream file but no references in UDD > soapdenovo of debian-med has upstream file but no references in UDD > slicot of debian-science has upstream file but no references in UDD > sbmltoolbox of debian-med has upstream file but no references in UDD > sumo of debian-science has upstream file but no references in UDD > saint of debian-med has upstream file but no references in UDD > > This is a sign the umegaya gatherer failed in updating the records of > these packages. Any reason for this?
Hi Andreas, When the first attempt of guessing the URL of a package was a failure (returning 'NA', further attempts were not possible, explaining why the above packages were missing. I am adding a daily cron job that cleans the database, so that this does not happen anymore. Individual packages can be cleaned with the command 'umegaya-adm -p <package> -d'. More self-consistency checks are needed. Everybody intersted in Umegaya is welcome to help ! In order to better follow issues with a bug tracker, and to make sure that what is running on blends.debian.net (upstream-medatada.debian.net) is standard and easily accessible to all, I am uploading Umegaya to the Debian archive. I will update blends.debian.net with standard Debian packages. Have a nice week-end, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
