Hi, On Thu Apr 25, 2013 at 20:56:08 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Paul Wise wrote: > > Most of the PTS is currently static HTML/etc files, that can change > > approximately every 6 hours, depending on changes in the archive and in > > external package checkers (lintian etc). The PTS is a fairly essential > > service for package maintainers and it would be nice to take advantage > > of it's static HTML generation to provide information to maintainers > > even when the main host is down or disconnected. > > Please don't implement this for now. The planned GSOC project concerning > the PTS is likely to change this initial design decision of having almost > only static content. > > High availability is important for the PTS because it is a central part of > the communication infrastructure too, and that can't be done with > static.d.o. So we should probably investigate other ways to make it fault > tolerant rather than a simple redundancy of static HTML pages.
what is the reason to move away from working static webpages? I also wonder where the CPU cycles for dynamic web pages will come from... Not amused, zobel -- Martin Zobel-Helas <zo...@debian.org> Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130425194426.gl30...@ftbfs.de
