Hi Paul, On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:11:52PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > Sounds quite interesting. > > http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2013/StudentApplications/SimonChopin > http://lists.debian.org/20130425115056.21764.39271@mithrandir
Cool. > > I have introduced a 'title' field. Please check again > > > > > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=blends/website.git;a=blob;f=misc/pts/taskinfo-example.py > > > > It now creates two different JSON files that should contain all needed > > information. Please tell me if something might be missing. > > Looks good, here are some examples, I would be interested in your thoughts. > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/~pabs/g/gromacs.html Looks very good! > http://packages.qa.debian.org/~pabs/g/gimp.html > http://packages.qa.debian.org/~pabs/g/ghemical.html I'm not fully convince about the numbered tasks. Failing to be able to make a better suggestion I'd be fine if this would be implemented but perhaps somebody else might have a better idea. > Let me know if you want some other packages rendered or any changes made. The principle seems to be clear ... > I changed the wording to tasks instead of blends since it is more > task-focused. No problem for the moment. I'm not sure if we should mix up generic tasksel tasks and Blends tasks in case we get at some point in time the tasksel data imported. But that can be discussed later. > When there are more than 5 tasks, I currently display numbers instead. > Maybe where there are more than 5 tasks I should list just the blends > instead of individual tasks? Hmmm, I do not think so because finally the user would be forced to seek to sometimes a lot of tasks if he really want to find the dependency. That's also not friendly. KInd regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130527204955.gi16...@an3as.eu
