Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi! The buildd status on qa.debian.org shows individual architectures using colors and symbols such as ⎇ ∉ ✔ ✘ ∿. Alas, these symbols are arranged by arch name, without grouping into release and non-release archs. This means, it is not obvious at a glance if a given failure is important or not.
Even RC regressions aside, I would like to know if it's a modern arch with real users such as ppc64el or a museal/hobbyist piece such as hppa. While porting to weird archs may uncover real bugs[1], most of us have sharply limited tuits, and thus would prefer to prioritize. Thus, could you please put all release archs first, -ports later? Meow! [1]. Once, a failure on hppa let me notice that upstream code has a bogus fixed-size assumption on the size of pthread cond var objects. -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.0 APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.1.8-00052-ge7ab11e613bf (SMP w/64 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
