On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 12:04:24PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Even if debcheck learnt about the debian-debug archive, I'd still > > consider a package from the main archive having Suggests to a package > > from the debug archive something weird. > > So are you suggesting I move pari-gp-dbgsym back to main ? Would the > FTP masters allow that ? (pari-gp-dbgsym used to be named pari-gp-dbg > and be in main).
Actually, I'd suggest you just drop that Suggest. What usefulness is it
bringing anyway to your average user, suggesting them to intsall debug
symbols? Is it something so common for this package to have to debug
its activity?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
