On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 01:18:58PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > could we take this "opportunity" to re-evaluate if udd-mirror would be > better provided from a DSA machine/vm, instead of a third-party cloud > provider
Unfortunately, last I checked (that wasn't that long ago, perhaps a year
or 2?) DSA was **very** against the idea of offering a public-accessible
postgres database.
> (that can be locked down if the account owner becomes unresponsive)?
Well, that's supposed to be the point of the "debian.net team" at
least...
> it appears as if this service has gotten quite some tools depending on
> it and probably reassessing its maintenance is in order.
fwiw, those "tools" include myself, I am also getting spammed by my own
scripts that started failing :sweat_smile: /o\
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
