Followup-For: Bug #1059631 X-Debbugs-Cc: mity...@debian.org Hi Dmitry - could you recommend whether there's anything I should do next for this bug?
As context: the patch was accepted upstream, but with modifications that make it cleaner for Qt6.6 albeit in a non-5.15.x compatible way. I realize that might not be ideal maintainence-wise; sorry about that. I'm a bit unclear on the licensing status of 5.15.x and that's making me uncertain about whether to offer another patch for that lineage upstream. My sense is that with the patch here and also the patch from #1059592 applied, we would see at least eight qt-related packages in Debian building with more reliable reproducibility. Not a huge number, but it's becoming rarer to find fixups like this that benefit multiple dependent packages (a good thing). Thanks, James
