On Wednesday 24 February 2016 23:27:53 Arthur Marsh wrote: > that was with exactly the same kernel, and packages as reported in this > Debian bug report.
Which one? Just for kicks I've collected all the 'Kernel: ' lines from this bug report: Kernel: Linux 4.4.0+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.4.0+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-rc8-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-rc8-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-rc8-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-rc8-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.4.0+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-rc2+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-rc3 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-rc3+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-rc3+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-rc4+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-rc5 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-rc5+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores) In that list I see only ONE kernel which was released by Debian and that was 4.4.0-rc8-amd64 ... which wasn't even a stable kernel.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
