Adam Di Carlo wrote: > If we're going to go so far as to update slink for the 2.2 kernel, we > need to update PCMCIA as well.
Yes, I know. That's something I already planned to do. > The big unknown for a linux 2.2 and slink is other architectures. > Personally, I have my doubts that the linux 2.2 kernel is more robust > and stable than 2.0 for non-i386 architectures. Well according to boot-floppies, at least 2 of the other architectures used 2.2 kernels already in slink. Presumably because the support for them was much better then in 2.0. -- see shy jo
