[Cc:'d debian-release because there might be some people who care about how Debian CDs will end up in the stores ;-]
Hi! Joel Goldberger wrote me with some questions, and one of them was how the Official CDs should be named/labeled. Below is what I'm currently doing myself. - Does anyone have a better suggestion? - Should we have "official names"? (i.e. "recommended names" in the CDimages FAQ section) Regards, Anne Bezemer On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > About identification: my personal favorite is > > Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 > Official i386 Binary-1 > > If there is enough space, the first line could be > > Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 "Potato" > > And variations of the second line: > > Official alpha Binary-2 > Official m68k Binary-3 > Official sparc Binary-2 > Official ppc Binary-1 > Official Source-1 > > etc.
