Daniel Barclay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > From: Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ... > > > > At 21:18 +1000 2000-04-23, Herbert Xu wrote: > > >> kernel-image-2.0.36_2.0.36-3.deb ???? > > >> kernel-image-2.0.38_2.0.38-3.deb ???? > > >> kernel-image-2.2.10_2.2.10-1.deb ???? > > >> kernel-image-2.2.12_2.2.12-4.deb ???? > > >> kernel-image-2.2.13_2.2.13-2.deb ???? > > >> kernel-image-2.2.14-ide_2.2.14-4.deb conflicts w/ 2.2.14 > > >> kernel-image-2.2.14-idepci_2.2.14-1.deb conflicts w/ 2.2.14 > > >> kernel-image-2.2.14_2.2.14-4.deb conflucts w/ 2.2.14-ide > > > > > >2.0.36/2.2.10/2.2.12/2.2.13 should all be removed.
Has someone filed a bug against ftp.debian.org to remove this? Could they, please? > > I don't think we should have any 2.0 kernel binary in potato. I don't see why not? > If 2.0.38 is kept, make sure it has the IDE disk corruption patch > (2.0.38pre1.ide.patch.gz, if that's not something already in 2.0.38). Have you filed an RC bug then? -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
