On Aug 21, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > I know there are still plenty of video cards that xviddetect does not > detect. I can see a lot of bug reports to that effect. > > I think it would be worthwhile to maintain a branch of xviddetect so > that anXious could know about more videocards which get updated at > Potato point releases. Do you agree?
I think that would be a very good idea. However, for woody, I think we should probably move to the libdetect (HardDrake) code base (now in unstable as of yesterday). Incidentally, you may actually be able to get a more complete card database for 2.2r1 by parsing the board info files in libdetect and massaging them into anXious' format. IIRC the X server for each card is listed there. Chris
